25 Comments
User's avatar
Tom Haviland's avatar

Mary Talley, in addition to the myocarditis issues that affect the cardiovascular system, I have been tracking the TIMING and PREVALENCE of the WHITE FIBROUS CLOTS that Cath Lab workers and embalmers have been finding in the veins and arteries of both the living and the dead since the Covid jabs rolled out. In my latest "2024 Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Survey," 83% of embalmers (250 out of 301) responding said that they are STILL seeing these unusual clots in a shocking 27% of their corpses!

I've been invited to be a Guest Speaker at the Tennessee Funeral Directors Association Annual Conference on 8 June 2025, where I'll also be conducting a survey to learn what embalmers are seeing through the first half of 2025. You can follow all of my work at my assistant, Ms. Laura Kasner's Substack called "Clotastrophe" at: LauraKasner.Substack.com

-Tom Haviland (creator of 2022, 2023, and 2024 "Worldwide Embalmer Blood Clot Surveys," "2024 Cath Lab Worker Blood Clot Survey," and "2024 People's Blood Clot Survey")

Expand full comment
Mary Talley Bowden MD's avatar

Great thank you…. 10 sources of data now!

Expand full comment
Eccentrik's avatar

thanks for all you've been doing Tom, I've been following your work!

'blood-borne systemic amyloidosis' is a horrifying prospect, and your convos (especially with Greg Harrison) should be seen by EVERYONE

---> https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/weve-identified-a-new-blood-borne?r=8ypo0

Expand full comment
Tom Haviland's avatar

Thanks, Eccentrik! You are correct. Greg Harrison's team of scientists is doing VERY IMPORTANT work right now confirming the presence of "amyloid proteins" (i.e., misfolded proteins) in the white fibrous clots, and even more importantly the possibility of "prion proteins" that are INFECTIOUS and cause other perfectly healthy proteins around them to misfold as well. If this turns out to be true, as several RT-QuIC tests have already shown, then this could be disastrous news for humanity.

Expand full comment
Eccentrik's avatar

If these prions can be ‘shed’ or transmitted to the unvaccinated more readily than normal prions, then we’ve truly got a worldwide TICKING TIME BOMB :/

interesting how they’re pushing ‘self-amplifying mRNA’ now, isn’t it? That cadaver stat was 27%… I don’t want to think what it could get to…

btw are you familiar with Sucharit Bhakdi? He’s a retired microbiologist, but he coauthored a paper in 2022 - https://doctors4covidethics.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/causality-article.pdf

To my knowledge, he’s one of the earliest to predict “prion-mediated CNS degeneration” and “aberrant vascular protein deposition (amyloidosis)”

Expand full comment
Tom Haviland's avatar

Yes, I watched Sucharit Bhakdi's videos early in the pandemic warning the establishment that didn't listen to him about the disastrous choices that they were making.

Expand full comment
Eccentrik's avatar

hopefully new protocols and protocols like McCullough's can keep things in check while this crap is still at the 'coffee ground' not 'calamari' level

Expand full comment
Kevin Duffy's avatar

This is sickening. All of the doctors, politicians and scientists behind pushing this should be in jail.

Expand full comment
JohnS's avatar

Which would leave very few doctors, politicians and scientists walking around free . . and wouldn’t we all be better off!

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

I predicted a while back that once the truth begins to tip the scales, as it IS slowly doing, those medicos who ignorantly propagated this mess will have a hard time moving forward in their lives. The movie Angelheart comes to mind. Again, all planned, all predicted, all part of the culling plan.

Expand full comment
DELMAR L GREENLEAF MD's avatar

Thanks!…..

Here’s another topic: my comments:

The destructive force of misinformation (Lying) by educational resources and the media is leading our course of DEMISE…

Here’s an example:

Recently, Peter Marks went on record claiming that “the higher number of autism cases that have been reported over the years almost certainly results from improved diagnosis rather than an increase in prevalence.” …..

Actually it is due to a change in the definition of Autism as changed in the DSM-4

(Diagnostic & Statistical Manual-4); The hanbook used through out the practice of Psychiatry.

It was changed in the 1980 edition & then again in 1994 to include many more additional types of patients including; Asperger’s sundrome, Rett’s Syndrome, (Pervasive Developmental Disorder–Not Otherwise Specified) (PDD-NOS) as well as Cildhood Disintegrative Disorder ( CDD)!! These were added into the new, now expanded Umbrella category of AUSTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER.

No wonder the numbers of individual cases increased……by adding other individuals not previously included!!!!!!

RFK and most media reports are ignoring this; THE REST OF THE STORY (ie- The TRUTH)…… This is a strategy to fool the public !!!!

During these past decades other things increased contemporaneously with Autism as well;

including TVs, Rock n Roll,

Sit Coms, cell phones, internet use, 5-G wave emitions, plastic surgery, Satellite communication waves, CO2 !,

Cars, air travel , anti-biotics, anti-depressants, Mullet haircuts…… Shouldn’t we be investigating potential causality of these temporally correlated events as well as immunizations ??🤔🧑‍💻🤓🤷🏼‍♂️.

Expand full comment
Tom Martin's avatar

All one has to do is look for aluminum in the brain tissue of autism victims dead or alive. That is the cause and are only found in one of the above mentioned simultaneous events=vaccines & the number of vaccines now on the childhood vaccine schedule is appalling- many with aluminum. The body has miraculous defenses in respiratory system, our skin, & our digestive system. Vaccines bypass them all. It does not take a rocket scientist to put those things together.

Expand full comment
Marc Bikowsky's avatar

All I can say is that I was forced to take the vaccine because I’m a self-employed heating and air conditioning contractor in a small liberal college town. I was being turned away by customers simply because I didn’t have a vaccine card. Eventually, I caved—because if I didn’t, I would’ve starved. But if I could go back in time, I’d choose to starve.

Since then, I’ve been dealing with severe fatigue and joint pain throughout my entire body. I’ve seen countless doctors trying to figure out what’s wrong, but the pain and exhaustion haven’t let up. It’s gotten so bad that my business is now suffering—I can no longer put in a full eight-hour day. Before the vaccine, ten-hour workdays were the norm.

This physical decline has also led to serious depression. I can’t keep up with the workload or accomplish the things I used to take pride in. And if that wasn’t enough, my wife—who is 5’ tall, 108 pounds, and was in perfect shape—went from having normal blood pressure to dangerously high levels, borderline stroke range. She’s now on four different blood pressure medications and is still considered hypertensive.

Then, things got even worse. She was diagnosed with stage 4 ovarian cancer. The biopsy revealed it’s a rare and chemo-resistant form. Genetic studies showed that her cancer was environmentally triggered.

Treating her over the past 16 months has drained us completely. Our savings and retirement are gone. The medical bills are mounting, and at 52 years old, I’ve never felt more depressed, broken, or afraid.

I’ve tried everything. Doctors now have me on medications I can’t get off of—benzodiazepines for anxiety, high doses of acetaminophen for the pain. I feel like I’m at the end. After 26 years in business, I’m in worse shape—physically and financially—than when I first started.

Expand full comment
Kyle BMaxHawaii's avatar

Please look into the results/info from Dr William Makis, substack from Canada. Oncologist who only deals with Cancer...

Aloha & God Bless, kyle

Expand full comment
Marc Bikowsky's avatar

My goodness. Thank you so much for one heartfelt response. I will definitely look into it. Thanks again.

Expand full comment
Surak's avatar

Praying for the recovery of both of you. There are many protocols out there: FLCCC-IMA, McCullough, Zelenko, and so on. I hope you both get on IVM pronto, nattokinase (over the counter), bromelain, curcumin, vitamins C and D, and so on. See more details here:

https://imahealth.org/treatment-protocols/

Expand full comment
Marc Bikowsky's avatar

Thank you so much. It’s all been so overwhelming. I seriously can’t express my gratitude.

Expand full comment
George Sirianni's avatar

this is a great summary of the adverse effects of the covid 19 vaccines. thank you very much. i will send to my family and friends.

Expand full comment
Sharon olson's avatar

Mahalo!

Expand full comment
Dan Michael's avatar

Excuse me as I am not a medical person at all.

I remember from a year or two ago a study in which either Dr. John Campbell or maybe Dr. Mobeen Syed discussed a very compelling study. It was a great study because the researchers tested troponin levels BEFORE and AFTER getting the Covid shot. Vaguely, I remember that about 1 in 35 people showed substantial troponin level rises after getting the shot. The control group did not show the Troponin rise. Great study since BEFORE and AFTER results were measured. (Troponin levels are a way of measuring heart damage) I believe the study was done in Switzerland? Symptoms were subclinical.

Expand full comment
Mike Babcock's avatar

Has this been peer reviewed?

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Hunter's avatar

The article titled “Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives” by M. Nathaniel Mead, Jessica Rose, William Makis, Kirk A. Milhoan, et al., published in April 2025, presents a critical analysis of myocarditis risks associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. The authors contend that mRNA vaccines have led to more cases of myocarditis than SARS-CoV-2 infections, including those caused by the Omicron variant. They argue that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not as rare or mild as commonly portrayed and may have lasting effects. Furthermore, they question the risk-benefit balance of continued mRNA vaccination, particularly for males under 40, and advocate for the withdrawal of these vaccines from the market due to the purported risk of myocardial damage. Their conclusions are drawn from a literature review encompassing clinical trial reanalyses, post-marketing surveillance, and observational studies.

However, the article’s assertions diverge significantly from the prevailing scientific consensus. Extensive research, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, indicates that the risk of myocarditis is substantially higher following SARS-CoV-2 infection than after mRNA vaccination. Specifically, the relative risk of myocarditis was found to be over seven times greater in individuals who contracted COVID-19 compared to those who received an mRNA vaccine. Moreover, when vaccine-associated myocarditis does occur, it is typically mild and resolves with minimal intervention, as noted by the CDC.

Independent Evidence

Peer-Reviewed Studies:

• Studies in journals such as The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA have repeatedly found that:

• Myocarditis after vaccination is rare (e.g., 1–5 cases per 100,000, mostly mild).

• Myocarditis after COVID-19 infection is more common and often more severe.

• Long-term outcomes for vaccine-associated myocarditis are generally favorable.

The authors of the article in question, including Jessica Rose and William Makis, have previously expressed critical views on COVID-19 vaccines, which may introduce bias into their analysis. Additionally, the article does not appear to be peer-reviewed in a major medical journal, and its conclusions contradict the majority of high-quality, peer-reviewed evidence. Leading health authorities, such as the CDC and WHO, continue to support the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, emphasising that their benefits in preventing severe disease, hospitalisation, and death outweigh the associated risks.

Voleti N, Reddy SP and Ssentongo P

(2022) Myocarditis in SARS-CoV-2

infection vs. COVID-19 vaccination: A

systematic review and meta-analysis.

Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9:951314.

doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.951314

Expand full comment
Surak's avatar

Note on the under-reporting factor: my comparison of VAERS and V-Safe (unpublished) finds that number to be 17. Just curious how you got 57. Kirsch-Rose estimated 41.

"...the number of cases of both myocarditis and pericarditis was high enough to meet CDC’s criteria for a safety signal." The criterion for a safety signal should be a national scandal. They use the PRR, proportional risk ratio. This only finds a problem if the proportion of a given adverse event, not the absolute number, differs substantially from previous vaccines.

Imagine that the typical vaccine led to 1 case of cardiovascular disease and 1 case of cancer in 1000 patients. If the COVID jab leads to 100 cases of CVD and 100 cases of cancer in 1000 patients, the PRR says there is no problem, because half of the adverse events are still CVD and half are still cancer - even though the absolute number is 100 times higher! Good grief. Secretary Kennedy needs to discard the PRR signal detection method and replace it with an absolute risk ratio.

Expand full comment
Marcus Wheeler, MD's avatar

God bless you, Mary, and thank you for sharing!

Expand full comment
Kristi's avatar

I will share!!

Expand full comment